
SEOUL, June 08 (AJP) - A year after a deadly crash in central Seoul left nine pedestrians dead, new data show a sharp rise in traffic accidents involving elderly drivers, adding urgency to discussions about mobility alternatives like driverless robotaxis.
According to a June 8 report from the Korea Insurance Research Institute, drivers aged 65 and older were responsible for 20 percent of all traffic accidents in 2023. That figure is up dramatically from 6.8 percent in 2015, reflecting a demographic shift that has yet to be matched by policy solutions. During the same period, the share of elderly license holders nearly doubled, from 7.6 percent to 14.9 percent.
“Among all licensed drivers, the number of traffic accidents per 100 people is second-highest for the elderly, after drivers in their twenties or younger,” said researcher Kim Hae-sik, author of the report “Elderly Driving: Technological Change and Insurance Systems.” “While accident numbers are falling in other age groups, they continue to rise among older drivers,” Kim said.
The statistics come in the wake of a tragic incident near Seoul City Hall on July 1, 2024, when a 68-year-old man behind the wheel of a Genesis G80 drove into a crosswalk, killing nine and injuring several more. The driver claimed unintended acceleration, but forensic investigators later concluded that the accelerator had been pressed 90 percent of the way and that there had been no attempt to brake.
Since then, police have shortened the license renewal cycle for older drivers from ten years to five and tightened aptitude screening. Local governments have also encouraged drivers aged 65 and older to surrender their licenses voluntarily. Even so, just 2.2 percent did so in 2024.
A public survey conducted last July suggests there’s strong support for further measures. Out of 500 adult respondents, 26.5 percent favored mandatory safety systems for elderly drivers, 23 percent supported stronger incentives for voluntary license return, and 19.9 percent called for stricter physical and cognitive testing.
Still, as Kim pointed out, the gap between public opinion and real-world action remains wide.
“Despite strong public support for policies like incentives to return licenses, the low rate of actual returns shows that older adults have few reliable ways to get around after giving up driving,” he said.
Kim believes that driverless robotaxis could be the breakthrough. First showcased at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) this January, autonomous vehicles are designed to operate without human input and could allow seniors to travel independently without relying on private cars.
Unlike conventional taxis, robotaxis are being developed as personal-use vehicles, replicating the convenience of car ownership without requiring anyone to drive. Boston Consulting Group and other firms expect the technology to be commercially available before 2030.
But the arrival of fully autonomous vehicles raises difficult questions around insurance and liability.
“In a fully autonomous environment, the owner and operator of the vehicle may not be the same, making it difficult to assign responsibility under the current system, which ties liability to the driver or vehicle owner,” Kim said. “This calls for a structural overhaul of the current automobile insurance framework.”
For robotaxis to succeed, he argued, public institutions need to step in. Not just to support the technology, but to protect the people using it.
“We need to guarantee mobility access for non-driving seniors through services like robotaxis, spread out risk through public insurance, and secure social trust through a new legal framework that clearly defines liability,” he said. “Insurance products should be designed in a way that society supports seniors’ safety during robotaxi use.”
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.