A local college admissions fair, intended to provide accurate information to students and parents, has come under fire for its chaotic management. The event, organized by the Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education, attracted over 10,000 attendees amid a heatwave, yet failed to provide adequate cooling, leaving many students unable to receive counseling.
Additionally, at other regional fairs, universities were reportedly forced to conduct eight hours of continuous counseling without any meals provided, and booth fees were charged based on the university's reputation, raising serious concerns about unfair practices that require immediate attention.
Additionally, at other regional fairs, universities were reportedly forced to conduct eight hours of continuous counseling without any meals provided, and booth fees were charged based on the university's reputation, raising serious concerns about unfair practices that require immediate attention.
Heatwave and Limited Water Supply Create Unbearable Conditions
The college admissions information fair held on July 11 at a university gymnasium in Gyeonggi Province was described as chaotic. An official from a metropolitan university stated in a phone interview, "Despite the heat warning, over 10,000 people attended, but the indoor cooling was non-existent, making it as hot as outside. Large fans were either not operational or ineffective, and when complaints were made, the organizers simply replied that there was nothing they could do."
The official expressed frustration, saying, "The only refreshments provided to university representatives were two bottles of water per booth, with no additional supplies."
The discomfort for visitors and university representatives continued even after the event ended. Although the pre-announced parking fee was 3,000 won, the exit system required individual payments at the toll booth, causing delays of 30 minutes to over an hour for many attendees trying to leave.
The official criticized the organizers for their poor administrative handling, stating, "Instead of a pre-paid parking system, they forced us to pay at the exit, which caused significant delays."
The official expressed frustration, saying, "The only refreshments provided to university representatives were two bottles of water per booth, with no additional supplies."
The discomfort for visitors and university representatives continued even after the event ended. Although the pre-announced parking fee was 3,000 won, the exit system required individual payments at the toll booth, causing delays of 30 minutes to over an hour for many attendees trying to leave.
The official criticized the organizers for their poor administrative handling, stating, "Instead of a pre-paid parking system, they forced us to pay at the exit, which caused significant delays."
Education Office's Dependence on Contractors Leads to Rigid Counseling System
The most significant issue was the rigid structure of the counseling sessions. Typically, college fairs allow universities to manage their own waiting times and counseling schedules flexibly. However, the Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education handed over event preparation and management to a private contractor, enforcing a strict and inflexible ticketing system.
Another official from a metropolitan university noted, "The education office mandated that each counselor could only assist 18 students for 20 minutes each. As soon as the fair opened at 10 a.m., all tickets were gone by 10:30, leaving latecomers without any opportunity for counseling."
He added, "If no-shows were allowed or if we could accommodate walk-ins, we could have counseled many more students. However, due to the education office's adherence to the contractor's rigid setup, the complaints from parents who could not receive counseling fell entirely on the universities."
Even universities that finished their counseling early were required to remain until the event's official end at 5 p.m., highlighting the unreasonable management practices.
Another official from a metropolitan university noted, "The education office mandated that each counselor could only assist 18 students for 20 minutes each. As soon as the fair opened at 10 a.m., all tickets were gone by 10:30, leaving latecomers without any opportunity for counseling."
He added, "If no-shows were allowed or if we could accommodate walk-ins, we could have counseled many more students. However, due to the education office's adherence to the contractor's rigid setup, the complaints from parents who could not receive counseling fell entirely on the universities."
Even universities that finished their counseling early were required to remain until the event's official end at 5 p.m., highlighting the unreasonable management practices.
Other Regional Fairs Also Face Criticism for Poor Management
Investigations revealed that the issues at the Gyeonggi college admissions fair are not isolated. Similar problems have been reported at fairs in other regions, including Yeongnam and Honam, where university representatives have faced blatant disregard from organizers.
An official from a metropolitan university expressed outrage, stating, "At a fair in Yeongnam this week, we were forced to operate our booths from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. for eight hours straight without any meals provided."
He questioned, "Is it reasonable to demand that we speak for eight hours without even providing food?" He also criticized the organizers for imposing strict deadlines for delivery schedules, showcasing a lack of consideration for the participants.
An official from a metropolitan university expressed outrage, stating, "At a fair in Yeongnam this week, we were forced to operate our booths from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. for eight hours straight without any meals provided."
He questioned, "Is it reasonable to demand that we speak for eight hours without even providing food?" He also criticized the organizers for imposing strict deadlines for delivery schedules, showcasing a lack of consideration for the participants.
Discriminatory Booth Fees Based on University Reputation
Reports have also surfaced regarding discriminatory practices in booth fees based on university reputation. An official from a metropolitan university pointed out, "At some regional fairs, so-called 'preferred Seoul universities' are exempt from booth fees to encourage their participation, while local universities desperately seeking new students are charged fees."
He recounted an incident where, after initially being asked to pay a fee, the organizers quickly changed their stance to allow participation without payment when they expressed reluctance to attend.
The official lamented, "What should be a public event aimed at education has devolved into a profit-driven enterprise."
As college admissions fairs, which should alleviate students' and parents' anxieties by providing accurate information, are being undermined by the incompetence of organizers and the commercial interests of private contractors, the burden falls squarely on the students and universities. Representatives from various universities emphasized that regional education offices must implement thorough oversight and management reforms to restore the true purpose of these fairs.
He recounted an incident where, after initially being asked to pay a fee, the organizers quickly changed their stance to allow participation without payment when they expressed reluctance to attend.
The official lamented, "What should be a public event aimed at education has devolved into a profit-driven enterprise."
As college admissions fairs, which should alleviate students' and parents' anxieties by providing accurate information, are being undermined by the incompetence of organizers and the commercial interests of private contractors, the burden falls squarely on the students and universities. Representatives from various universities emphasized that regional education offices must implement thorough oversight and management reforms to restore the true purpose of these fairs.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.