Recently, the opening of the Xin'an River Bridge and the potential visit of Kim Jong-un to Dandong have captured media attention. Analysts have focused on themes such as 'North Korea-China closeness,' 'North Korea-Russia alignment,' and 'diplomatic maneuvers aimed at the United States.' While these analyses have merit, my experience in trade and commerce reveals a different perspective: the true essence of this significant development is economic.
Seven to eight years ago, examining trade data often revealed astonishing realities. Before the sanctions on North Korea, there was a well-known secret in the fashion industry of South Korea, China, and Japan: "Do you know who actually sewed the elegant coats sold in South Korean department stores?"
At that time, the border between North Korea and China across the Yalu River functioned as an integrated factory. China would send fabrics and materials, and skilled workers in Sinuiju and Pyongyang would complete the garments, which were then sent back to China. Although labeled as 'made in China,' the real added value came from North Korean craftsmanship, with orders from South Korea and Japan at the end of the supply chain.
After being disrupted by COVID-19 lockdowns and sanctions, this intricate system is beginning to operate again. The new focus is on 'wigs and false eyelashes.' According to statistics from the General Administration of Customs of China, wigs and eyelashes have become North Korea's top export item to China since 2023, accounting for more than half of North Korea's annual exports to China. Raw materials, such as hair, are sent from China to North Korea, where residents process them into finished products for re-export to China. This represents a perfect restoration of a 'new processing subcontracting model' that exploits gaps in UN Security Council sanctions.
This division of labor is not merely a 'trick trade' but is driven by the urgent interests of both countries. The Xi Jinping administration has long been preparing for border trade innovation and development policies, establishing the groundwork for border trade zones and economic cooperation.
From China's perspective, North Korea is a 'trump card.' Amid the global supply chain reshuffling, China has been relocating factories to countries like Vietnam, Pakistan, and Bangladesh to cope with rising labor costs. However, there is no other place on Earth that offers low-cost, high-quality skilled labor as North Korea does. Particularly for the struggling economy of Northeast China, North Korean labor and resources are a 'lifesaver.' For China, North Korea is a crucial asset.
For North Korea, China is an economic lifeline essential for survival. While military ties with Russia may appear impressive, it is China that holds the key to the flow of essential goods, basic industrial materials, technology, and capital. The opening of the four-lane Xin'an River Bridge will eliminate the logistical bottleneck that relied on outdated railways. This is where U.S. economic sanctions against North Korea are effectively being undermined.
To summarize: First, the tight sanctions imposed by the U.S. and other Western nations are effectively being neutralized through border division of labor and infrastructure expansion. Second, the expansion of economic exchanges between North Korea and China is not merely a display of friendship between the two leaderships but is based on thorough economic benefits (cost reduction for China and revitalization of Northeast China, foreign currency acquisition for North Korea). Third, the prolonged U.S.-China conflict has led China to increasingly value the economic significance of North Korea as a buffer zone.
The issue lies with us. China remains our largest trading partner and key supply chain ally. However, a powerful 'new North Korea-China international division of labor' system is taking root right before our eyes, combining Chinese capital and raw materials with North Korean labor. What will happen if we are completely excluded from this massive supply chain restructuring?
Economically, it would mean permanently ceding the future production base and domestic linkage network involving North Korea to China. Diplomatically, South Korea's leverage in addressing the Korean Peninsula issue would inevitably diminish. This is not the time to be solely focused on grand security rhetoric. We must recognize the flow of money and goods that will pour in with the opening of the 'Bridge over the Yalu River.' It is crucial to calmly assess the economic impact of the restoration of North Korea-China economic relations and proactively seek out trade opportunities.
Author's Background
▲ Current Director of the Korea-China Economic Research Institute ▲ Researcher at the National Diplomatic Academy ▲ Research Fellow at the International Trade Research Institute ▲ Former KOTRA Officer in Charge of China Research
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.