The Korean Football Association is discussing the possibility of directly electing its next president. Following the national team's failure to advance past the group stage in the North and Central America World Cup, the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism and the Korean Sports Council are considering a shift from an indirect election system to a direct election process. Although this change comes late, it is deemed necessary.
Historically, the election of the Football Association president has been conducted by a limited electorate. While the current structure cannot be outright deemed unreasonable, there have been consistent criticisms regarding its failure to adequately reflect the diverse voices within the football community. If the channels for coaches, players, referees, amateur athletes, and local associations to participate in the association's governance have been limited, then reform is unavoidable.
However, the introduction of a direct election should not be viewed as a panacea for all of Korean football's issues. Changing the election process is merely a procedural adjustment. What is more crucial is how the new president will restore trust in the beleaguered football administration through vision and accountability.
The recent World Cup failure cannot be attributed solely to poor performance in a single tournament. Issues surrounding the management of the national team, distrust in the coaching selection process, the association's closed decision-making, and a lack of communication with fans have accumulated over time. The appearance of a photo of the Football Association's logo draped in mourning at the airport upon the team's return symbolized the disappointment and anger of fans towards the football administration.
More important than how the new president is elected is the type of association that will be created. Organizations should be governed by systems rather than the leadership of specific individuals. If policy directions fluctuate with each change of president and major decisions are concentrated in the hands of a few, then whether through direct or indirect elections, the outcome will remain unchanged. The departure of a particular individual does not automatically alter the organizational culture and decision-making structure. If the same structure persists, the same conflicts and distrust are likely to recur, even with a new president.
Therefore, discussions about direct elections must go hand in hand with governance reform. It is essential not only to expand the electorate but also to distribute the concentrated powers of the president. Key issues such as coaching appointments, national team management, financial execution, and major contracts should be handled responsibly by independent and specialized bodies. The structure where one person's judgment dictates the entire association's system must change.
The Korean Sports Council and the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism should not view this issue as solely a problem for the Football Association but as an opportunity to review the electoral systems and governance of all sports organizations. If reforms are merely cosmetic, similar controversies will inevitably arise in other sports.
Korean football still boasts outstanding players and passionate fans. What is lacking is trust in the administration, not talent. Fans turned away not because of a single defeat but due to the absence of a visible system to rectify failures.
Direct elections represent a meaningful starting point. However, standing at the starting line does not guarantee reaching the destination. What Korean football needs now is not just a change in the election method but administrative innovation that goes beyond that. Satisfaction with merely changing personnel will not suffice. Only by reforming the system and establishing a proper framework can Korean football begin to regain trust.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.