Concerns are growing that without parental support, young people may struggle to buy homes. "The income and asset criteria for policy loans exclude young people who truly need assistance. Can we reduce these blind spots?" said Choi Seo-eun, a woman in her 20s.
Experts are divided on whether to expand loan support to restore the housing ladder for young people. Some argue that increasing financial support, such as policy mortgages, is essential for young individuals with limited assets, while others caution that lowering loan thresholds in a constrained supply environment could merely inflate home prices and household debt.
On July 15, the Financial Commission held a public discussion on real estate financial policy at the Bank Hall in Jung-gu, Seoul, focusing on support for young homebuyers and the management of jeonse loans. The opinions expressed will be reviewed by relevant ministries and discussed at a comprehensive real estate policy forum attended by President Lee Jae-myung on July 23.
Lee Ok-yeon, chair of the Financial Commission, noted, "There is a coexistence of concerns about household debt and housing market stability, alongside worries that the housing ladder for young and non-homeowners has narrowed. I urge discussions on how to precisely distinguish between genuine and speculative demand, ensuring that jeonse loans support housing stability for the underprivileged without exacerbating market instability."
During the discussion, concerns were raised that the criteria for policy loans could push young people out of the system. Shin Jin-chang, secretary general of the Financial Commission, referred to the so-called "marriage penalty," where dual-income couples are excluded from policy loans due to simple income aggregation. He stated, "If there are unreasonable aspects in the income and asset criteria, we will consider adjustments based on the feedback received."
Opinions on supporting youth loans were polarized. Lee Dae-yeol, head of the Korea Housing Association, argued, "If loan eligibility is determined solely by current income and assets, even capable young individuals will find it difficult to purchase homes. The disparity among young people may widen depending on parental asset support." He suggested enhancing existing systems like policy mortgages rather than directly easing regulations.
Conversely, Professor Park Sun-young of Dongguk University warned that expanding financial support in a limited supply environment could benefit sellers or developers rather than young buyers. He likened easing loan regulations to "drinking saltwater when thirsty," emphasizing the need to prioritize supply and fiscal policies, such as public rental housing and special allocations.
SK Securities Executive Director Seo Young-soo expressed concern about uniformly categorizing young people as genuine demanders. He cautioned that failing to distinguish between young individuals who can afford high-priced homes with parental or grandparental support and those preparing to buy without assets could lead to further disparities and market distortions.
Opinions also diverged regarding jeonse loans. Kim Mi-ru, a researcher at the Korea Development Institute (KDI), argued that jeonse loans backed by public guarantees could drive up rental prices in areas with limited supply, advocating for a focus on vulnerable groups in determining loan eligibility. In contrast, Kim Won-jang, vice president of Sampro TV, contended that not all demand from non-homeowning low-income individuals seeking better rental options near their workplaces should be viewed as speculative, stressing that jeonse loans for genuine demanders should not be uniformly reduced in the context of a shortage of public rental housing.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.