President Lee Jae-myung has sold his apartment in the Su-nae-dong area of Bundang, Seongnam, for 2.9 billion won, becoming a homeowner for the first time in 28 years. The property, which he owned since 1998, was transferred on July 16, along with a mortgage of 1.77 billion won held by the President and his wife. While the exact amount of unpaid balance has not been disclosed, the buyer received ownership before paying the full purchase price, with the President securing a claim against the property as collateral.
The timing of the transaction is notable. The apartment is located in Yangji Village, designated as a leading area for redevelopment of the first new town, with the application for a project implementer designation completed last month. It is expected that the designation will be announced by the end of this month. In speculative areas, rights to properties acquired after the designation may be limited. The timing of the ownership transfer, just two days after the contract, raises questions about the redevelopment schedule.
There is a legal distinction between financial loan regulations and private agreements regarding unpaid balances. The transaction, where the seller established a mortgage to secure the unpaid balance, does not appear to be illegal. The Bundang District Office has stated that there were no issues or special privileges during the land transaction approval and real estate reporting processes. The concern lies not in legal violations but in the gap between the government's loan regulations and the President's transaction method. Last October, the government imposed a limit of 200 million won on housing loans for properties exceeding 2.5 billion won in the metropolitan area and regulated zones. The mortgage applicable to this 2.9 billion won apartment is also capped at 200 million won. However, the President allowed the buyer to defer payment of the balance while securing a mortgage of around 1.7 billion won on the property, effectively easing the buyer's initial financial burden due to the loan regulations.
The Blue House explained that while the President was not obligated to sell his home, he sold it for 2.9 billion won, lower than surrounding listings, to demonstrate a commitment to real estate normalization. They stated that the mortgage was established due to the buyer's circumstances. The buyers are expected to sell their current apartment by the end of October and pay the balance, leading to the cancellation of the mortgage. While the circumstances are becoming clearer, the actual amount of unpaid balance and interest terms have not been disclosed. Although ownership has been transferred, the transaction is not yet fully settled.
It is not necessary for the President to sell a home at a low price, nor should he favor the buyer. However, as the highest authority of a government enforcing strict loan regulations, the President bears a greater responsibility to explain the unusual terms of this transaction. The Blue House should transparently disclose the actual amount of unpaid balance, interest rates, and repayment terms related to the transaction.
Trust in real estate policy is not gained merely by imposing strict regulations. The credibility of the policy is strengthened when those who create it respect its intent in their own transactions. More important than the symbolism of the President becoming a homeowner is whether the process aligns with the principles the government has demanded from the public. If the focus remains solely on the intent to normalize without addressing the substantial mortgage, it will be difficult to maintain trust in the policy.
The timing of the transaction is notable. The apartment is located in Yangji Village, designated as a leading area for redevelopment of the first new town, with the application for a project implementer designation completed last month. It is expected that the designation will be announced by the end of this month. In speculative areas, rights to properties acquired after the designation may be limited. The timing of the ownership transfer, just two days after the contract, raises questions about the redevelopment schedule.
There is a legal distinction between financial loan regulations and private agreements regarding unpaid balances. The transaction, where the seller established a mortgage to secure the unpaid balance, does not appear to be illegal. The Bundang District Office has stated that there were no issues or special privileges during the land transaction approval and real estate reporting processes. The concern lies not in legal violations but in the gap between the government's loan regulations and the President's transaction method. Last October, the government imposed a limit of 200 million won on housing loans for properties exceeding 2.5 billion won in the metropolitan area and regulated zones. The mortgage applicable to this 2.9 billion won apartment is also capped at 200 million won. However, the President allowed the buyer to defer payment of the balance while securing a mortgage of around 1.7 billion won on the property, effectively easing the buyer's initial financial burden due to the loan regulations.
The Blue House explained that while the President was not obligated to sell his home, he sold it for 2.9 billion won, lower than surrounding listings, to demonstrate a commitment to real estate normalization. They stated that the mortgage was established due to the buyer's circumstances. The buyers are expected to sell their current apartment by the end of October and pay the balance, leading to the cancellation of the mortgage. While the circumstances are becoming clearer, the actual amount of unpaid balance and interest terms have not been disclosed. Although ownership has been transferred, the transaction is not yet fully settled.
It is not necessary for the President to sell a home at a low price, nor should he favor the buyer. However, as the highest authority of a government enforcing strict loan regulations, the President bears a greater responsibility to explain the unusual terms of this transaction. The Blue House should transparently disclose the actual amount of unpaid balance, interest rates, and repayment terms related to the transaction.
Trust in real estate policy is not gained merely by imposing strict regulations. The credibility of the policy is strengthened when those who create it respect its intent in their own transactions. More important than the symbolism of the President becoming a homeowner is whether the process aligns with the principles the government has demanded from the public. If the focus remains solely on the intent to normalize without addressing the substantial mortgage, it will be difficult to maintain trust in the policy.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.