Second Phase of Public Institution Relocation: Strategies for Success

by Kwon,sung jin Posted : August 2, 2026, 18:04Updated : August 2, 2026, 18:04

As the government prepares to announce its second phase of public institution relocations, there is growing emphasis on the importance of strategic placement for regional balanced development. Experts suggest that the success of this phase will depend not just on moving institutions to rural areas, but on how effectively these institutions can create synergies with local industries.

According to relevant authorities, up to 350 public institutions, including those remaining in the metropolitan area and government-funded organizations, are being considered for relocation. The government plans to unveil its relocation strategy in the second half of the year, with a focus on initiating moves starting next year with leading institutions.

The second phase is likely to adopt a "concentrated placement" approach, which considers the functions of institutions and their industrial connections. This strategy aims to cluster related agencies around key regional industries such as marine, finance, and energy to enhance synergy. For instance, energy-related public enterprises and institutions may be concentrated in the Honam region, while financial and marine agencies could be placed in Busan.

The government is exploring this method to avoid repeating the limitations of the first phase of public institution relocations. While the initial relocation aimed at equitable distribution across regions, it fell short in fostering industrial connections and creating a self-sustaining growth foundation. Hong Jong-hyun, a professor at Chung-Ang University, noted, "The excessive dispersion of institutions across regions during the first phase failed to achieve the expected concentration and balanced development effects."

Experts express concern that political considerations may influence the relocation of public institutions. Kang In-soo, a professor of economics at Sookmyung Women's University, warned, "As political considerations increase, existing principles may be compromised, weakening the concentration effect and leading to poor site selection." Lee Hyang-soo, president of the Korean Association for Local Government Studies and a professor at Konkuk University, added, "During the first phase, political interests often took precedence over regional characteristics, making it difficult to achieve the original goal of national balanced development."

Improving living conditions is also identified as a key challenge. During the first phase, inadequate educational, healthcare, and cultural facilities hindered family relocations, leading to a phenomenon where some residents only worked in innovation cities during the week and returned to the metropolitan area on weekends. Lee emphasized, "Some innovation cities still lack essential living infrastructure, and we need to consider relocating public institutions responsible for education, healthcare, and cultural facilities alongside the agencies themselves."

There is also a call to strengthen ties with local communities. When public institutions relocate, they should establish partnerships with local universities to create talent development programs and employment connections. Ma Kang-rae, a professor at Chung-Ang University, stated, "We need to create a structure where local universities and communities grow together, and municipalities with such plans should be prioritized as relocation sites. Simply focusing on increasing tax revenue will not lead to success."

Minimizing relocation costs is another challenge. Ma noted, "The first phase incurred significant costs in developing new sites for innovation cities. Instead of developing new farmland, we should actively utilize existing vacant urban spaces and public facilities."

Some experts suggest that fostering hubs around metropolitan areas may be more efficient than creating new innovation cities. Hong proposed, "Initially placing public enterprises and institutions in metropolitan areas and then expanding to regional centers is advisable, as it allows for cost savings by utilizing existing infrastructure and maximizing industrial concentration effects."





* This article has been translated by AI.