The Vietnamese government is moving to recognize parents' authority to oversee school meal programs while prohibiting actions that disrupt meal preparation and operations. This initiative comes amid rising complaints from parents regarding the quantity and hygiene of school meals, leading to a debate between those advocating for oversight and those concerned that individual complaints should not halt meals for all students.
According to VnExpress on October 29, the Ministry of Education and Training has drafted regulations concerning meal operations for boarding and semi-boarding students and is collecting feedback until November 7. The draft allows parents to monitor the quality and hygiene of school meals and raise concerns, but it also restricts actions that could interfere with meal preparation.
Parents are encouraged to collaborate with schools to educate their children about nutrition, food safety, and healthy eating habits. They are permitted to appropriately inspect meal operations and communicate suggestions for improvements to schools or relevant authorities. However, the Ministry has specified that exercising this authority must not disrupt meal preparation, although the draft does not clarify what constitutes interference.
This regulation has gained attention in light of recent controversies over inadequate school meals in Vietnam. Complaints have emerged from parents at schools such as Trung Hoa and Quang Binh 1, where the cost of meals is 40,000 VND (approximately $1.70), yet parents report insufficient portions or lack of freshness in food ingredients.
Some schools have been criticized for serving dishes primarily made from leftover pork fat. At Kim Bai, Nguyen Quy Duc, and Duc Giang elementary schools, meals have reportedly arrived 2 to 3 hours late, prompting backlash from parents.
To enhance transparency in meal operations, the Ministry plans to require schools to publicly disclose daily and weekly menus and verify that the food served matches the menu. Local administrative bodies will review food safety and storage and transportation conditions of suppliers to determine meal operation methods and contracts.
“Is pointing out meal issues considered interference?” Mixed reactions on oversight authority
Parents' primary concern is the lack of clarity regarding what constitutes disruptive behavior in meal operations. Online discussions have raised concerns that parents might be restricted from demanding meal service suspensions when hygiene issues arise. One commenter questioned, “If a surprise inspection reveals unsafe food, does preventing my child from eating it count as interference?” Another noted, “It’s hard to understand how raising concerns about meal quality could be seen as disruptive.”
Calls for increased transparency in meal operations have also emerged. Some commenters suggested that school principals and teachers should eat the same meals as students or that public cameras be installed in cafeterias to monitor cooking and serving processes. There are also demands for establishing minimum standards for portion sizes and nutritional content.
Conversely, some argue that complaints from a few parents should not disrupt meal access for the majority of students. One commenter stated, “If one or two parents in a class of 40 raise complaints, it shouldn’t lead to the entire meal service being halted, forcing the other 38 or 39 families to prepare meals at home.”
Suggestions have been made to eliminate school meals altogether, advocating for families to prepare lunchboxes or for only students with specific dietary needs to find alternative meal solutions. Conversely, there are calls for schools to directly hire kitchen staff and manage food supplies.
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Education and Training aims to clarify responsibilities among stakeholders in meal operations and prevent food safety incidents through this regulation. However, specific criteria to distinguish legitimate parental concerns from disruptive actions have yet to be established. Balancing food safety with ensuring that students' meals are not unnecessarily interrupted remains a key issue.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.