Busan's free suit rental program for job interviews, known as 'Dream Closet,' has come under scrutiny after receiving a 'poor' rating in a performance evaluation. The city has allocated 1.2 billion won for the program over the next three years, raising questions about the appropriateness of this funding given the evaluation results.
Concerns have been raised about the lack of a concrete plan to address the operational improvements identified in the evaluation, as well as insufficient data to confirm the actual number of beneficiaries, leading to debates over the validity of the budget allocation.
During the 341st regular session of the Busan City Council on November 9, Ryu Do-hee, a member of the Planning and Finance Committee, focused on the performance evaluation results, the duration of the contract, and the appropriateness of the budget allocation for the Dream Closet program.
The Dream Closet program aims to alleviate the financial burden on young people preparing for job interviews by providing free rental suits. However, it received a score of 69 in the recent evaluation, categorizing it as 'poor.'
According to a proposal submitted during the 339th extraordinary session regarding the public institution's outsourcing agreement for the Youth and Industry Bureau in 2027, evaluators acknowledged the program's necessity but suggested considering its integration with existing youth support initiatives, such as the Dream Center.
Despite this, the city has included a total of 1.2 billion won in the proposal for annual funding of 400 million won from 2027 to 2029. The planned budget for next year is 50 million won higher than this year's allocation of 350 million won.
Conversely, the administrative audit materials indicate that plans for enhancing the program are set to begin in November of this year. The proposal for increased funding and a long-term contract was presented before specific improvement measures were established, raising doubts about the appropriateness of the program's management procedures.
Ryu emphasized the need to distinguish between the program's necessity and the appropriateness of its operational methods. He urged that the suggestions for integration and improvements raised in the performance evaluation be reflected in actual operations rather than relying solely on the demand for suit rentals from young people.
Concerns about equity in the duration of contracts were also raised. Previously, the Planning and Finance Committee had amended and approved related proposals during the 339th extraordinary session, shortening the contract duration for five new projects to one year. This decision was based on the need to verify the performance and operational outcomes of these projects.
In contrast, the Dream Closet program, which received a poor evaluation, has been allocated a three-year contract. This discrepancy in applying shorter verification periods for new projects while allowing longer contracts for underperforming existing programs has sparked ongoing debate.
The current 'Busan Metropolitan City Ordinance on the Outsourcing and Agency of Municipal Affairs' stipulates that performance evaluation results should be considered when determining contract renewals and that evaluation results should be utilized in the budget allocation process.
Additionally, the city's operational guidelines state that the performance evaluation committee should deliberate on the future direction of underperforming projects, including whether to maintain, reduce funding, or terminate them.
Concerns were also raised about the lack of basic data to verify the program's performance. The city reported that 8,527 individuals utilized the Dream Closet last year, and 6,919 had done so by September of this year.
However, since a single user can rent a suit up to seven times a year, it remains unclear whether these figures accurately reflect the actual number of beneficiaries after excluding duplicate usage.
Ryu requested that data distinguishing between duplicate usage be submitted. He argued that without differentiating between usage statistics and actual beneficiaries, it is challenging to accurately assess the program's performance and the effectiveness of budget expenditures.
The need for integration with employment support programs was also highlighted. Ryu called for the suit rental program to be linked with other youth employment support initiatives and for concrete improvement measures to enhance employment support effectiveness.
In response, the head of the Youth Policy Bureau acknowledged that there had been insufficient attention to the council's concerns and the review of program improvements while focusing on the transition of the outsourcing method. He committed to enhancing the operational approach to strengthen ties with employment support programs and to submit a plan for program enhancement before the budget review.
Ryu stressed that the results of the performance evaluation must lead to actual operational improvements and urged the submission of the integration review results and specific program improvement plans before the budget review.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.