India: A Diverse Nation Poised for Growth and Strategic Partnerships

by Kang Min seon Posted : May 24, 2026, 19:33Updated : May 24, 2026, 19:33

Mark Twain (1835–1910), the great American author, recorded his impressions after traveling to India: "India is the cradle of humanity, the birthplace of human language, the mother of history, and the grandmother of legend, and the great-grandmother of tradition. The most valuable and instructive materials in human history are treasured only in India."


Once regarded as a storehouse of civilization, India is now emerging as a new axis of growth that shakes the global economic order. It is the world's most populous country, the youngest economic giant, and simultaneously the most complex civilization.


However, South Korea's perspective on India remains narrow. Many view it merely as a market for cheap labor, a vast consumer base, or a production hub to replace China. Yet, India is not a simple country; it is a continent, a civilization, and a world in itself. Therefore, the strategy for engaging with India should not be a short-term export plan but a long-term civilizational strategy spanning 30 years.


Especially if the administration of President Lee Jae-myung is genuinely preparing for an Asian era, it must focus on cultivating Hindi experts at a national strategic level, rather than just English specialists. A generation that understands Hindi, Tamil, Bengali, and Marathi, in addition to Chinese and Japanese, is essential. Diplomacy begins with language, and trust starts with cultural understanding. The future with India will not be opened by interpreters but by people.


The ancient Roman philosopher Seneca said, "To a person who does not know to which port he is sailing, no wind is favorable." South Korea now stands before that question: Where are we headed? Will we only seek a path between the United States and China, or will we design our future alongside India, a new axis of civilization?


The 'I Ching' states, "The movement of heaven is vigorous; the superior man makes efforts unceasingly." This means that as the heavens move strongly, the noble man continuously trains himself. South Korea, facing the vast civilization of India, also needs this spirit. What is required is not impatience but sustainability, not short-term results but long-term strategies.


The ancient Indian text 'Upanishads' states, "Only truth prevails. Falsehood never triumphs." This has become the root of the motto of the Republic of India: 'Satyameva Jayate.' Relationships between nations can only endure based on truth and trust.


Understanding India's history is crucial to understanding its economy. India is not merely an emerging country; it is one of the oldest roots of human civilization. The Indus Valley Civilization, around 2500 BC, was already at the pinnacle of ancient civilization with urban planning and sewage systems. Following this, the formation of Vedic civilization and Hindu thought, the birth of Buddhism, the Maurya dynasty and the reign of Emperor Ashoka, and the golden age of the Gupta dynasty established India as a center of philosophy, religion, mathematics, and astronomy.


The concepts of 'zero,' the decimal system, yoga, Buddhism, Upanishads, and Vedanta philosophy all originated in India. A significant axis of human intellectual history was created here.


However, India's history is not only one of glory. Centuries of Islamic rule and subsequent British colonialism deeply shook Indian society. While the British left behind railways and administrative systems, they also instilled structures of division and poverty.


After gaining independence in 1947, India, under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru, embarked on a grand experiment in democracy. It became the country with the largest participation in democracy and the most complex electoral system.


Post-independence, India was long tied to a socialist planned economy and protectionism, which slowed its growth. However, after economic reforms in 1991, the direction changed. Market liberalization, increased foreign investment, and the development of the information technology industry have shaped today's India.


Now, India stands at another turning point. It sustains over 1.4 billion people while achieving food self-sufficiency and exporting agricultural products worth billions of dollars annually. The International Monetary Fund notes a growth rate of 6-7%. With the world's third-largest economy by purchasing power parity, India is a beneficiary of the restructuring of supply chains, becoming a new center of manufacturing. Viewing India merely as a populous nation misses the essence; today's India must be understood through the structural changes that drive its population.


To understand India, one must first grasp its super-diversity. India is not a single nation but is closer to a 'federation of civilizations.' The constitution recognizes over 22 official languages, including Hindi and English, while hundreds of languages and dialects exist. The cultural sensibilities of the Hindi-speaking North and the Dravidian-speaking South are distinctly different.


Religiously, India is complex. While Hinduism is the majority, the Muslim population ranks among the largest in the world, alongside Sikhism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Christianity. Although the remnants of the caste system are legally prohibited, they still operate in reality.


The commercial acumen of Punjab, the entrepreneurial spirit of Gujarat, the intellectual traditions of Bengal, the manufacturing base of Tamil Nadu, the IT ecosystem of Karnataka, and the financial centrality of Maharashtra are all distinct. In India, it is more important to ask, "Which India do you know?" rather than simply stating, "I know India."


Companies that ignore this diversity have mostly failed. A notable example is POSCO's steel plant project in Odisha. In 2005, POSCO initiated the construction of a large integrated steel mill in Odisha, marking the largest overseas investment by a South Korean company at the time. However, issues such as land acquisition, local opposition, environmental regulations, conflicts between the central and state governments, and political changes led to prolonged delays and ultimately resulted in failure.


South Korean companies often think, "The contract is done, so the business is finished." However, in India, community trust lasts longer than contracts. Local communities are stronger than laws, and relationships matter more than speed.


Walmart also faced significant challenges with regulations and distribution structures during its initial entry into India, while Vodafone suffered prolonged difficulties due to tax disputes. Nokia encountered issues with tax matters and policy changes.


The common thread in these failures is the perception of India as a single market.


Now, India must be viewed through a SWOT analysis.


The strengths are overwhelming. First, India is young, with a median age of about 28. While South Korea, Japan, and China face aging populations, India possesses a robust working-age population. Second, its digital infrastructure is strong. The 'India Stack' has significantly improved financial accessibility and administrative efficiency through digital identity verification and payment systems. This is not just fintech; it is an innovation in national governance. Third, India has a framework of democracy and the rule of law, with institutional safeguards that, although slow, can change direction.


Weaknesses are also evident. First, there is growth without employment. While the IT and service sectors are growing, there are not enough manufacturing jobs. Second, there is an education gap. Although there are many graduates, there is a lack of skilled workers ready for the industry. Third, inefficiencies in infrastructure and administration exist. Different regulations and tax systems across states exhaust foreign companies. Fourth, the remnants of the caste system and regional disparities create invisible social barriers that hinder productivity.


Opportunities are clear. India is a key beneficiary of the 'China Plus One' strategy amid U.S.-China tensions. The movement of companies like Apple and Foxconn is symbolic. There is significant potential for collaboration with South Korea in sectors such as semiconductors, batteries, automotive, defense, shipbuilding, and energy.


However, threats also exist. There are rising protectionism, political nationalism, religious conflicts, regional policy changes, and a slower-than-expected pace of reforms. India is always full of potential, but it is also difficult to predict.


Thus, South Korea's strategy should not be "enter quickly" but rather "stay together for the long term." First, the government must cultivate Hindi experts as national strategic assets. It should systematically supply a pool of India specialists to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, KOTRA, the Korea International Trade Association, and large corporations. This requires long-term projects at the university and national research institute level, rather than short-term training programs. Second, companies should not only focus on the capital, New Delhi, and the financial hub, Mumbai, but also develop state-level strategies. Tamil Nadu should focus on manufacturing, Karnataka on information technology, Gujarat on industrial infrastructure, and Telangana on advanced industries. Third, a model of joint growth is needed rather than simple investment. Projects in healthcare, education, vocational training, agricultural technology, smart cities, railways, and ports are crucial. India is not just a market for selling goods but a partner in nation-building. Fourth, a 30-year plan must be established. Trust cannot be built with India through policies that change with each administration. A long-term platform, such as a Korea-India Joint Future Committee, is necessary.


The 'Doctrine of the Mean' states, "If you persist, you will shine; if you shine, you will go far." The 'Tao Te Ching' also states, "A great nation is like a low stream, a nation that accepts all waters." This means that a great nation does not dominate but flows low and accepts everything. India is such a nation. It is slow but deep, complex but enduring. India is not a fast nation, but it is a nation that lasts. South Korea is a fast nation, but sometimes it forgets too quickly.


POSCO's failure was not a business failure but a failure of understanding. What is needed going forward is not capital but patience. Not contracts but friendship. The India that Mark Twain referred to as the great-grandmother of tradition is now transforming into the youngest economic giant. While India's per capita GDP remains low, the future is determined not by numbers but by direction.


In 30 years, the order of Asia is likely to be rewritten around India. If South Korea wishes to remain not just a trading partner but a true friend, it must prepare now.


India is not just a market. India is the future.

[Photo: Yonhap News Agency]
[Photo: Yonhap News Agency]




* This article has been translated by AI.