"Let’s have a cup of tea together."
Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon recently suggested a tea meeting with President Lee Jae-myung during a broadcast of TV Chosun's "Strong Opponents." While this could be dismissed as mere pleasantries, the political implications are significant. If a meeting between President Lee and Mayor Oh occurs, it would carry more weight than a simple encounter.
Mayor Oh has emerged as a leading contender for the presidency following his victory in the recent local elections. His unprecedented fifth term as Seoul mayor, along with cross-voting support from both the northern and southern districts of the city, has bolstered his reputation as a centrist candidate.
The key question is whether President Lee will accept this proposal. Politically, there are both advantages and disadvantages for him.
From a governance perspective, collaboration with the Seoul city government is essential. Seoul is the economic and population center of South Korea, and there are no pressing issues—be it real estate, transportation, tourism, or international events—that can be resolved without the city's cooperation.
However, the political implications are considerable. Mayor Oh is viewed as one of the most competitive candidates from the conservative camp. A public meeting to discuss policies would inevitably elevate his political stature, especially following his recent electoral success.
Historically, the Blue House has been cautious in establishing relationships with prominent opposition figures, as such meetings can confer legitimacy to their political status.
If the two leaders do meet, what topics might they discuss? Real estate, surprisingly, may be a challenging area for consensus.
Mayor Oh advocates for increasing supply through the revitalization of redevelopment and easing regulations.
In contrast, President Lee has emphasized market management, demand suppression, and expanding the public sector's role. The philosophical divide is significant, making it difficult to find common ground quickly.
More likely points of agreement may lie elsewhere, particularly regarding the 2027 World Youth Day (WYD) scheduled for August next year in Seoul. This event is expected to attract hundreds of thousands, potentially up to a million, young people and pilgrims from around the world. The WYD is not just a religious event but a national project that requires extensive coordination, including the visit of Pope Leo XIV, as well as arrangements for accommodation, transportation, tourism, and safety.
The event cannot be managed solely by the city or the central government. In terms of boosting the tourism industry and enhancing the national brand, there are few areas where the Lee administration and Mayor Oh share mutual interests.
Moreover, the Seoul city government has already demonstrated its capability in managing international events. During the 2023 Saemangeum World Scout Jamboree crisis, the city quickly mobilized resources to accommodate thousands of participants, implementing measures for lodging, transportation, cultural events, and safety management. It played a crucial role in resolving a national crisis.
As a result, ahead of the 2027 WYD, both the Seoul Archdiocese and the central government are likely to rely heavily on the city's administrative capabilities and experience in managing international events. Welcoming hundreds of thousands of foreign pilgrims for the WYD is not merely a religious gathering; it is an international event directly linked to South Korea's national brand.
Additionally, areas such as attracting foreign tourists, fostering the international conference industry, and hosting global events are also seen as potential collaboration opportunities. Some in the political arena suggest that if the tea meeting takes place, it could symbolize a new era of cooperation.
However, the broader significance lies elsewhere. President Lee is currently the most powerful figure in South Korea, while Mayor Oh is one of the strongest contenders for the next presidency. Therefore, their meeting could be interpreted as a pivotal moment in shaping the future political landscape, beyond just discussions of Seoul's municipal issues.
The tea meeting is still in the proposal stage. However, if it materializes, it will carry more significance than just sharing a cup of coffee. While they may remain at an impasse on real estate, unexpected common ground could emerge on national issues like the WYD, tourism, and international events.
Thus, there is keen interest not only in whether the tea meeting will happen but also in what topics will be discussed. Will this meeting mark the beginning of cooperation, or will it serve as a launching point for a different political trajectory?
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.