Kim Eui-gyeom, a member of the Democratic Party, stated on October 7 that Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae appears to maximize his political ambitions during critical moments, despite usually being calm and composed.
During an appearance on KBS Radio's 'Serious Issues,' Kim remarked, "Seeing such contrasting behaviors reminded me of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde." He was referring to Cho's statement read during a recent National Assembly audit.
Kim noted that the statement seemed to reflect Cho's personal views, adding, "I asked officials at the Supreme Court about it yesterday, and they said they were completely unaware of it." He expressed the impression that Cho appeared to have come to the audit specifically to deliver that message.
He further commented on the repetitive nature of the Chief Justice's recommendations and the President's rejections, saying, "How exhausting and unproductive is that?" He explained that the Constitution only outlines the recommendation, consent, and appointment powers, with the rest filled in by tradition. However, he criticized Cho for provocatively asserting, "This is my authority. If you touch it, it's unconstitutional."
Kim suggested that Cho's actions were calculated to utilize the National Assembly audit as a platform, warning that there is a risk of his aggressive tendencies erupting under certain conditions or timing.
Regarding Cho's emphasis that he had not cooperated with the state of emergency, Kim questioned, "Why is he only speaking out now after two years of doubts?" He expressed skepticism about the sincerity of Cho's remarks, given their timing during a politically sensitive period.
Additionally, Kim mentioned a shift in the internal party sentiment regarding Kim Ji-yong, the nominee for the Serious Crimes Investigation Agency. He noted that lawmakers who previously opposed Kim's appointment now seem to be focused on thorough verification.
During an appearance on KBS Radio's 'Serious Issues,' Kim remarked, "Seeing such contrasting behaviors reminded me of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde." He was referring to Cho's statement read during a recent National Assembly audit.
Kim noted that the statement seemed to reflect Cho's personal views, adding, "I asked officials at the Supreme Court about it yesterday, and they said they were completely unaware of it." He expressed the impression that Cho appeared to have come to the audit specifically to deliver that message.
He further commented on the repetitive nature of the Chief Justice's recommendations and the President's rejections, saying, "How exhausting and unproductive is that?" He explained that the Constitution only outlines the recommendation, consent, and appointment powers, with the rest filled in by tradition. However, he criticized Cho for provocatively asserting, "This is my authority. If you touch it, it's unconstitutional."
Kim suggested that Cho's actions were calculated to utilize the National Assembly audit as a platform, warning that there is a risk of his aggressive tendencies erupting under certain conditions or timing.
Regarding Cho's emphasis that he had not cooperated with the state of emergency, Kim questioned, "Why is he only speaking out now after two years of doubts?" He expressed skepticism about the sincerity of Cho's remarks, given their timing during a politically sensitive period.
Additionally, Kim mentioned a shift in the internal party sentiment regarding Kim Ji-yong, the nominee for the Serious Crimes Investigation Agency. He noted that lawmakers who previously opposed Kim's appointment now seem to be focused on thorough verification.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.