The atmosphere in Seoul is changing, similar to the shifts seen in the Yeongnam region. Currently, candidate Jung Won-oh is still leading within the margin of error. Experts explain that within this margin, the results can be considered statistically equivalent.
However, those experienced in elections understand that it is not just the current numbers that matter, but the trends. Recent polls show Oh Se-hoon has halved the gap in just a few weeks. The so-called "golden cross" is beginning to emerge in political discussions.
Seoul has always been a city that wavers until the end. While it may appear to lean left in national elections, local elections prompt voters to reconsider who can effectively manage the city. Many voters prioritize practical governance over ideology. This makes elections in Seoul particularly challenging and unpredictable.
This election is no different. Observations indicate that the Democratic Party's organizational strength is robust. Even in traditionally conservative areas like Seocho and Gangnam, Democratic candidates are actively campaigning, engaging with residents and canvassing neighborhoods. In contrast, the People Power Party appears relatively subdued, making it seem that the Democratic Party has the upper hand.
However, there is a peculiar scene: the expressions of the voters. Despite the Democratic candidates' vigorous efforts, the public's response is surprisingly lukewarm, bordering on indifferent. This suggests a sense of detachment, as if voters are saying, "We will wait and see."
This sentiment may be linked to the various confusions that have arisen since the inauguration of the Lee Jae-myung administration, including turmoil over real estate policies, controversies surrounding the cancellation of indictments, and excessive political arrogance. The government, less than a year in office, may already be showing signs of fatigue.
Nevertheless, the Democratic Party should not be underestimated. The real contest is just beginning. The progressive camp has historically demonstrated remarkable unity when feeling threatened. This has been evident in past elections, particularly in Seoul, where higher voter turnout tends to favor the Democratic Party. The enthusiasm among Democratic supporters on the ground is also significant. Therefore, the biggest risk for Oh Se-hoon’s campaign is complacency. Entering the margin of error signals not victory, but the true battle has begun.
However, Oh Se-hoon does have an advantage: his established credibility. Jung Won-oh has yet to be sufficiently vetted by the entire electorate in Seoul. As the election approaches, it remains uncertain what new controversies or variables, referred to as "hidden traps," may emerge.
While Jung has administrative experience in Seongdong-gu, questions remain about his readiness to manage a vast city like Seoul. Critics point out that instead of providing clear answers to recent controversies and policy confusions, he often responds evasively during public scrutiny.
Voter concerns include issues like the response to heavy snowfall, the Cancun trip controversy, the feasibility of redevelopment and transportation pledges, and budget issues related to smart shelters in Seongdong-gu. Despite these pressing questions, Jung has been criticized for occasionally deflecting with vague responses or political attacks. The Seoul mayoral election is a stage for "verification," not just "image." Voters will closely observe the candidates' attitudes and communication skills until the very end.
In contrast, Oh Se-hoon has already served as mayor four times and has experience as a member of the National Assembly, along with two electoral defeats. Politically, he is a well-analyzed figure, with both supporters and detractors already familiar with him. There seems to be little new to uncover.
In politics, verification can be a double-edged sword. It can leave scars but also provide stability. In a vast city like Seoul, "familiar competence" can be a surprisingly strong asset. Citizens often prefer to vote for managers rather than revolutionaries.
Thus, this Seoul mayoral election is not merely a battle of ideologies. It is a contest of "unity" versus "stability." The Democratic Party will push forward with its organization and enthusiasm, while Oh Se-hoon will counter with his experience and urban management skills.
Given the current momentum, the possibility of a golden cross certainly exists. However, the final week of elections in Seoul has historically defied predictions. Therefore, Oh Se-hoon’s campaign must remain vigilant until the end, as Seoul is a city that often changes its mind at the last moment.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.
