The Hwanggi Art Museum in Buam-dong, Jongno-gu, issued an apology regarding the damage to a ginkgo tree, but the lack of disclosure of key information has led to ongoing controversy among local residents and civic groups.
On June 2, the museum released a statement on its website, expressing, "We sincerely apologize to those who care about Buam-dong and the Hwanggi Art Museum," and added, "We are taking necessary measures to improve the situation and aid the recovery of the ginkgo tree."
The museum cited ongoing resident complaints dating back over a decade, including concerns about the proximity to high-voltage power lines, exposed roots causing safety issues for pedestrians, risks during typhoons and heavy snowfall, and problems with falling leaves and odors.
Additionally, the museum claimed that the ginkgo tree is located on a property co-owned by multiple parties, complicating administrative procedures for resolving issues such as pruning, and that discussions with the owners were not proceeding smoothly.
The museum emphasized that the roots of the ginkgo tree had caused the collapse of a wall, raising safety concerns for nearby residents and museum visitors.
However, the museum did not provide specific explanations regarding the core issues of the controversy. It did not disclose any information about the chemicals used in the treatment or management of the ginkgo tree, including the manufacturer, ingredients, injection method, or dosage. Civic groups and tree experts have argued that such information is necessary for accurately determining the cause of the damage and assessing the tree's recovery potential.
Recently, claims have emerged that climbing plants covering the wall near the ginkgo tree have also died, further escalating the controversy. Some have raised suspicions that the substances used on the ginkgo tree may have affected surrounding vegetation, but no official investigation results have been released to date.
The museum's emphasis on 'safety issues' is also a point of contention. While the museum repeatedly mentioned the potential for wall collapse and safety accidents due to the ginkgo tree, it has been reported that a safety assessment conducted by the Jongno District Office at the end of last year did not recognize any risks associated with the ginkgo tree.
Some individuals have stated, "What is more important than an apology is the transparent disclosure of information," calling for the release of specific data regarding the manufacturer, substances used, quantities, and expert consultation processes.
In response to the apology, netizens commented, "Is this an apology or just a series of excuses without mentioning what was done to the tree?"; "This is not an apology, it's an excuse"; "It sounds like they are saying they did nothing wrong and are being unfairly treated"; "Just close the museum"; "They will surely face consequences"; "Is the goal achieved now? This is so shallow."
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.