Unlike the public, who are sensitive to historical issues, the business sector often displays a troubling insensitivity. Recent events in the cultural and retail industries have highlighted a significant lack of historical sensitivity. The backlash from commodifying painful modern history and traditions for profit has been severe.
The most egregious misstep came from the retail sector. On May 18, the 46th anniversary of the Gwangju Democracy Movement, Starbucks Korea named a tumbler discount event "Tank Day" and included the phrase "Bang!" in promotional materials. This trivialized the tanks used by the military to suppress civilians and the absurd explanations given by police during the 1987 torture and death of Park Jong-cheol.
The controversy spread rapidly. Shinsegae Group quickly canceled the event and dismissed its president in an attempt to mitigate the fallout, but public sentiment remained cold, leading to a boycott of Starbucks.
On May 20, President Lee Jae-myung weighed in, referencing a previous controversy involving Musinsa's sock advertisement, stating, "While money can be a devil, one should not act in such a manner while wearing a human face." This marked a rare direct warning from the highest authority regarding the crossing of ethical lines in pursuit of profit.
The entertainment industry has not fared any better. The MBC drama "21st Century Great Lady," which had a budget of 30 billion won, faced intense backlash for its poor historical accuracy. It hid behind the guise of a fictional constitutional monarchy while misrepresenting the emperor's status and introducing dubious Chinese tea ceremony practices, which fueled accusations of historical distortion. The show echoed the painful mistakes of the 2021 SBS drama "Joseon Exorcist," which was canceled after just two episodes due to similar controversies, and the tvN series "Mr. Queen," which faced legal sanctions for dismissing historical records as mere "trash."
Despite the severity of the situation, the writers and directors responsible for historical accuracy were slow to reflect on their actions, leaving the lead actors to face public outrage and apologize in tears. The government's response, suggesting the recovery of funds after the controversy erupted, has drawn criticism as typical bureaucratic ineptitude, failing to address the issue proactively.
Given that we vividly remember the struggles for independence and democracy, it is natural for the public to be sensitive to historical matters. Without a proper understanding of history, filling the void with superficial marketing and irresponsible creativity will inevitably lead to public disdain. A few insincere apologies cannot cover the deep and damaging wounds that have been inflicted on the public's historical consciousness.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.