Search results
982 results
-
Former Interior Minister Choi Hyung-woo Passes Away, Political Tributes Pour In Choi Hyung-woo, a key political ally of former President Kim Young-sam and a prominent figure in the Sangdo-dong faction, passed away on October 24. His funeral home has seen a steady stream of condolences from politicians across the aisle, as his political journey, marked by a commitment to democracy during the harsh military regimes and his role in reform policies following the establishment of a civilian government, is being revisited.According to Yonhap News, Choi died at 3:30 a.m. at the Seoul National Veterans Hospital. He was 91 years old.Born in Ulsan in 1935, Choi entered politics as a student representative during the April 19 Revolution in 1960. He was elected to the National Assembly as a member of the New Democratic Party in 1971 and served six consecutive terms until the 15th National Assembly.Choi was subjected to torture for about three months after being taken by the National Security Command for criticizing the long-term rule of the Park Chung-hee regime. He faced further hardships after being detained shortly after the declaration of martial law by Chun Doo-hwans military government in 1980, which resulted in the loss of his parliamentary seat. He later became the secretary-general of the Democratic Movement Promotion Council in 1985, actively participating in the democracy movement.After the merger of three parties in 1990, Choi joined the Democratic Liberal Party, serving as the Minister of Interior under the Kim Young-sam administration after holding the position of Minister of Political Affairs and Secretary-General of the party. He was regarded as a key figure in the Sangdo-dong faction, often referred to as Left Dong-young, Right Hyung-woo alongside former Minister Kim Dong-young. Following his election in the 1996 general election, he was mentioned as a potential candidate for the next presidential election among the so-called Nine Dragons, but he suffered a stroke in 1997, leading to a prolonged battle with health issues.At the funeral home in Samsung Medical Center in Gangnam, Seoul, tributes from political figures continued to pour in. A wreath sent by President Lee Jae-myung was displayed alongside those from former National Assembly Speaker Jeong Ui-hwa, former Deputy Speaker Lee Seok-hyun, former Saenuri Party leader Kim Moo-sung, and former Democratic Party leader Son Hak-kyu. Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon, Minister of Planning and Budget Park Hong-keun, and People Power Party floor leader Jeong Jeom-sik also sent floral tributes to express their condolences.The funeral committee is chaired by Kwon No-gap, chairman of the Kim Dae-jung Foundation, along with Kim Deok-ryong, chairman of the Kim Young-sam Democratic Center, and Jeong Dae-cheol, chairman of the Korea Constitutional Society. The funeral will be conducted by the Korea Constitutional Society and the 4.19 Revolution Veterans Association, with Democratic Party leader Kim Min-seok and People Power Party leader Jang Dong-hyuk serving as co-chairs.Reflections on Chois commitment to the democracy movement and his unwavering loyalty to former President Kim Young-sam were shared at the funeral home.Jeong Dae-cheol recounted to Yonhap News an anecdote from 1978 when he and Choi met with Cardinal Kim Soo-hwan. At that time, Choi expressed confidence that the end of the Park Chung-hee regime was near, demonstrating his belief in democracy. Jeong remembered Choi as a “truly human person” who spoke his mind even to YS when he felt it was necessary.Chois son, Choi Je-wan, recalled that while his father was strict as a politician, he was warm-hearted towards his family. He shared that his father endured torture and house arrest under the Park and Chun regimes and learned during a medical examination in Germany after his stroke that his aorta had ruptured, which he believed was a consequence of the torture.The son also highlighted his fathers deep loyalty to Kim Young-sam, noting that even when he struggled to maintain his balance, he visited Kim every January 1 until the former presidents passing, demonstrating his commitment to their political bond.Independent lawmaker Han Dong-hoon, who has emphasized the legacy of the YS spirit, also visited the funeral home to pay his respects. He stated, “He devoted himself to protecting democracy during truly harsh times,” adding that without Choi Hyung-woo, South Koreas democracy would have been delayed.Chois funeral will be held over three days, with the burial scheduled for 8 a.m. on October 27 at the National 4.19 Democracy Cemetery.* This article has been translated by AI. October 24, 2026 19 -
O Se-hoon Acquitted in Appeal, Justice Party Calls It a Right-Wing Political Declaration The Justice Party condemned the Seoul High Courts acquittal of O Se-hoon, the mayor of Seoul, on charges of violating political funding laws, calling it a right-wing political declaration by Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae.Following the ruling on the afternoon of October 23, the party held a press conference where they expressed their disappointment, stating, This is nothing short of a declaration of right-wing politics by the Cho Hee-dae judiciary.Party leader Shin Jang-sik emphasized, Surveys were conducted for the mayors election, and the costs were covered by Kim Han-jeong, who is known as a supporter of the mayor. There is clearly collusion with political brokers. Yet, the court ruled in favor of the defendant. The judiciary has turned a blind eye to its own scales of justice, granting a free pass to illegal elections and political funding violations.Shin also referenced the Supreme Courts decision last May to overturn a ruling against presidential candidate Lee Jae-myung, questioning, Why does the Cho Hee-dae judiciary show such leniency only towards conservative and far-right figures?He characterized the acquittal as a form of judicial political retaliation and called for the impeachment of Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae and the passage of legislation to dismantle the court administration.Shin stated, We must impeach Chief Justice Cho and pass the court organization law to create a truly fair South Korea where illegalities and privileges do not prevail.* This article has been translated by AI. October 23, 2026 16
-
Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon Acquitted in Political Fund Case Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon was acquitted on charges of violating the Political Fund Law on October 23, prompting Myung Tae-kyun, a political broker, to assert that the factual circumstances differ from the ruling. Reactions from politicians across the aisle varied.Myung posted on Facebook, stating, I respect the judiciarys ruling, but the factual relationship is different from the verdict.Earlier, the Seoul High Courts Criminal Division 7, led by Chief Judge Koo Hoe-geun, overturned the original sentence that imposed a fine of 10 million won and a forfeiture of 21 million won on Mayor Oh. He had been indicted last December for allegedly receiving polling results from Myung ten times and having businessman Kim Han-jeong pay 33 million won on his behalf ahead of the April 7, 2021, Seoul mayoral by-election.This ruling alleviates the burden of a potential disqualification from office for Mayor Oh. According to Article 57 of the Political Fund Law, anyone convicted of receiving political funds with a fine of over 1 million won cannot assume or be appointed to public office for five years after the sentence is finalized. If the special prosecutor appeals, the Supreme Courts decision will determine whether Mayor Oh can retain his position.In response to the ruling, conservative lawmakers expressed their support. Former Daegu Mayor Hong Joon-pyo congratulated Mayor Oh on his acquittal, stating, I hope that politics will no longer be decided by the judiciary. He also urged Oh to focus on serving the ten million citizens of Seoul.People Power Party lawmaker Ahn Cheol-soo remarked that the second trials verdict was merely gossip, questioning the necessity of the special prosecutor and the trial itself. He expressed hope that this would mark the end of using the law as a weapon to disrupt politics and harm citizens lives.Conversely, members of the ruling party called for an immediate appeal by the special prosecutor. Park Joo-min, a member of the Democratic Party and a potential candidate for the next Seoul mayoral election, stated, It is difficult for the public to understand the courts judgment based on common sense, urging the special prosecutor to thoroughly contest the evidence and legal application in this ruling. He also called on the Supreme Court to rigorously examine the validity of the appellate courts findings and evidence assessment.Kim Jun-hyung, the floor leader of the Justice Reform Party, criticized the situation, saying, The cockroaches of hidden insurrection are all crawling out again, reaffirming his concerns.* This article has been translated by AI. October 23, 2026 15
-
Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon Acquitted in Appeal Over Political Funding Case Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon was acquitted in an appeals court on charges of receiving polling results from political broker Myung Tae-kyun and having the costs covered by a supporter. While the ruling drew backlash from the ruling party, conservative factions welcomed the decision as just.Han Byeong-do, the floor leader of the Democratic Party, expressed his disappointment on Facebook, stating, I regret the appeals courts decision that overturned the first trials guilty verdict. He added, This ruling does not align with public common sense, as there was concrete evidence presented during the special prosecutors investigation and trial that proved guilt. Yet, the appeals court disregarded established legal principles and accepted only the one-sided claims of Mayor Oh, granting him a pardon.He further remarked, It is difficult to understand how a ruling contrary to the first trial could be reached despite clear evidence and testimonies. Given the serious nature of this issue, which undermines the fairness and neutrality of elections that sustain democracy, the special prosecutor must immediately appeal to correct the legal errors of the appeals court.Cho Kuk, head of the Justice Reform Partys Policy Research Institute, noted, The backlash from judicial politics that we warned about repeatedly continues. This is a consequence of not firmly pursuing judicial reforms, including the abolition of the Judicial Administration Office and the impeachment of Cho Hee-dae.In contrast, conservative leaders expressed their approval. Jang Dong-hyuk, leader of the People Power Party, posted on Facebook, This is a just outcome. The special prosecutor, who brought unfounded charges, must take responsibility. As a result, Mayor Oh has alleviated the burden of losing his mayoral position. The special prosecutor should immediately abandon any futile Supreme Court appeal. He also stated, The person who should be on trial is not Mayor Oh, but the criminal who is Lee Jae-myung. The trial against Lee Jae-myung must resume immediately.Independent lawmaker Han Dong-hoon commented, During the first trial, the credibility of the testimonies from related parties was low and difficult to understand. I hoped the appeals court would rectify this. I am relieved that the appeals court did not yield to the blatant and disgraceful pressure from Democratic Party politicians like Kim Min-seok and Seo Young-kyo and corrected the first trials ruling.Meanwhile, the Seoul High Courts Criminal Division 7, led by Chief Judge Koo Hoe-geun, overturned the original ruling that imposed a fine of 10 million won and a forfeiture of 21 million won on Mayor Oh for violating the Political Funding Law. Oh was indicted last December for allegedly receiving polling results from Myung on ten occasions and having businessman Kim Han-jeong cover costs amounting to 33 million won ahead of the April 7, 2021, Seoul mayoral by-election.This ruling alleviates the burden on Mayor Oh regarding the potential loss of his mayoral position. According to Article 57 of the Political Funding Law, Anyone who is sentenced to a fine of 1 million won or more for the crime of receiving political funds improperly shall not be appointed or appointed to public office for five years after the sentence is finalized, and those who have already been appointed shall be dismissed from their positions. If the special prosecutor appeals, the Supreme Courts decision will determine whether Mayor Oh can maintain his position. October 23, 2026 14
-
Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon Acquitted in Appeal Over Political Funding Case Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon was acquitted in an appeals court ruling regarding allegations that he received polling results from political broker Myung Tae-kyun and had the costs covered by a supporter. While the ruling sparked backlash from the ruling party, conservative factions welcomed the decision as a matter of justice.Han Byeong-do, the floor leader of the Democratic Party, expressed his disappointment on Facebook, stating, I regret the appeals courts decision that overturned the first trials guilty verdict. He added, This ruling does not align with public common sense, as there was concrete evidence presented during the special prosecutors investigation and trial that proved guilt. Yet, the appeals court disregarded established legal principles and accepted only the one-sided claims of Mayor Oh, granting him a pardon.He further emphasized, It is difficult to understand how a ruling contrary to the clear evidence and testimonies could be reached. Given the serious nature of this issue, which undermines the fairness and neutrality of elections that sustain democracy, the special prosecutor must immediately appeal to correct the legal errors of the appeals court.Cho Kuk, head of the Justice Reform Partys Policy Research Institute, remarked, The backlash from the judicial politics we warned about continues. This is a consequence of not firmly pursuing judicial reforms, including the abolition of the Judicial Administration Office and the impeachment of Cho Hee-dae.Conversely, conservative leaders expressed their approval. Jang Dong-hyuk, head of the People Power Party, posted on Facebook, This is a matter of justice. The special prosecutor, who brought unfounded charges, must take responsibility. As a result, Mayor Oh has alleviated the burden of losing his mayoral position. The special prosecutor should immediately abandon any futile Supreme Court appeal. He also stated, The person who should be on trial is not Mayor Oh, but the criminal who is Lee Jae-myung. The trial against Lee Jae-myung must resume immediately.Independent lawmaker Han Dong-hoon expressed hope that the appeals court would rectify the issues with the first trials ruling, citing the unreliability of testimonies from related parties. He stated, I am relieved that the appeals court did not yield to the blatant and disgraceful pressure from Democratic Party politicians like Kim Min-seok and Seo Young-kyo and corrected the first trials ruling.Meanwhile, the Seoul High Courts Criminal Division 7, led by Chief Judge Koo Hoe-geun, overturned the original ruling that imposed a fine of 10 million won and a forfeiture of 21 million won on Mayor Oh for violating the Political Funding Law. Oh was indicted last December for allegedly receiving polling results from Myung on ten occasions and having businessman Kim Han-jeong cover costs amounting to 33 million won ahead of the April 7, 2021, Seoul mayoral by-election.This ruling alleviates the burden on Mayor Oh regarding the potential loss of his mayoral position. According to Article 57 of the Political Funding Law, Anyone who is sentenced to a fine of 1 million won or more for the crime of receiving political funds improperly shall not be appointed or appointed to public office for five years after the sentence is finalized, and those who have already been appointed shall resign from their positions. Should the prosecution appeal, the Supreme Courts ruling will determine whether Mayor Oh can maintain his position.* This article has been translated by AI. October 23, 2026 14
-
First Black House Speaker Possible as Democrats Aim to Retake House If the Democratic Party wins the upcoming midterm elections in November and regains control of the House of Representatives, Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) is likely to become the first Black House Speaker in January, according to a report by The Washington Post on October 22.The report states that the Democrats need to maintain their current seats and gain just three additional ones to reclaim the majority.Recent polls also indicate a strong possibility for the Democrats to return to power.This outlook is influenced by ongoing challenges faced by the ruling Republican Party, particularly the fallout from various Trump-related issues. President Donald Trumps approval ratings have dropped to the low 30s amid persistent inflation and unstable foreign policy, creating a challenging environment for the Republicans as the midterm elections approach.The Washington Post noted that as the election nears, Jeffries real challenge is not just about making history as the first Black House Speaker but also about uniting a party that has become ideologically diverse.In interviews with 20 congressional aides and lawmakers, Jeffries is described as a strategic leader with strong communication skills. Colleagues report that he is extremely cautious and deliberative in his approach.Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-MI) stated, Hakeem makes everyone feel their opinions are respected and works hard to understand where they are coming from. He will need to be stronger when he gets to the Speakers position, and he will be.Jeffries, who hails from Brooklyn, New York, graduated from Binghamton University, earned a masters degree in public policy from Georgetown University, and graduated from New York University School of Law. He first ran for the New York State Assembly in 2000, entered the state legislature in 2006, and was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2012, marking his entry into Washington politics. Although there were rumors of a potential run for New York City mayor, he focused on establishing himself in the House leadership.In 2018, he became the chair of the House Democratic Caucus, ranking fifth among House Democrats, and in 2022, he was elected as the first Black leader of the House Democrats.A close aide, speaking on condition of anonymity, described Jeffries as more consensus-oriented than any previous Speaker. Rather than pushing the party in a specific direction, he is known for his cautious style, waiting for members opinions to coalesce.This approach has also led to some discontent within the party. Notably, when two Democratic lawmakers sided with Republicans during a vote without prior coordination, calls for disciplinary action arose, but Jeffries only offered a general statement about the need for a serious response, raising concerns about party discipline.As a prominent pro-Israel figure, he faces criticism from progressive factions for not heeding calls from key supporters to halt aid to the Israeli government. While the ideological spectrum within the party has widened, Democrats are reportedly wary of the kind of pressure leadership exerted during Nancy Pelosis tenure.Moderate Rep. Adam Gray (D-CA) remarked, I do not react to those who hit my arm; my response to those who hit my arm is to endure even more.The Washington Post concluded that Jeffries success as Speaker will depend on how he manages a potentially unstable majority.* This article has been translated by AI. October 23, 2026 13
-
Op-Ed: France knows how to revolt. But can it reform? “Is Paris burning?” The question immortalized in the 1966 black-and-while epic war film evoked the threatened destruction of a city whose survival mattered far beyond France. Paris was a repository of civilization, its streets and monuments belonging, in some measure, to the world. Today, images of burning buildings and vandalized streets invite a different question. Can the country that helped teach the modern world how to overthrow an old order still find the political will to renew its own? France’s latest unrest began with students demanding better conditions in their schools. It widened into a confrontation over living costs, public services and austerity, drawing in workers and veterans of the yellow vest movement. Violence accompanied the demonstrations, including the burning of the historic town hall in Limoges. Once again, grievances that France’s political institutions could not resolve have spilled into its streets. The temptation is to reach for the familiar language of revolution. Yet the more troubling story is the failure of reform. Few countries carry a revolutionary inheritance as powerful as France’s. In 1789, the storming of the Bastille signaled a revolt against an entire structure of inherited privilege. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen established principles whose authority would outlast the governments that claimed to embody them. Revolution promised a future that the existing order could neither imagine nor accommodate. Its legitimacy rested on something larger than defiance: the conviction that political power had forfeited its moral authority and that a new order could better serve the people. Koreans understand that distinction. The April 1960 uprising grew out of outrage at electoral fraud that had emptied popular sovereignty of meaning. Students paid with their lives to restore a principle the government had betrayed. The democratic ideals of that uprising remain enshrined in South Korea’s Constitution. Such moments deserve remembrance. But their moral authority cannot be inherited by every movement that fills a street. France’s upheaval of May 1968 was itself different from 1789. Beginning with student protests against university authority and restrictive social conventions, it expanded into a nationwide crisis as workers joined the revolt. Even Charles de Gaulle, whose stature rested on his wartime leadership and the founding of the Fifth Republic, briefly left France for Baden-Baden to consult Gen. Jacques Massu. He subsequently dissolved the National Assembly and regained the political initiative. The political order survived. French society nevertheless changed profoundly. Authority in universities, workplaces and private life became more open to challenge. Demands for individual autonomy and greater equality acquired a force that an electoral victory could not extinguish. That is the ambiguity of 1968: a movement can fall short of political revolution while transforming the culture in which politics operates. The unrest of 2026 belongs to another historical moment. High school students have been prominent among its initiators. Their complaints concern the ordinary foundations of a credible future: functioning schools, adequate staff and the prospect of a life they can afford. These are demands that a wealthy democracy should be capable of addressing through its institutions. Their expansion into a broader protest movement reveals how widely that confidence has eroded. Yet anger, however understandable, does not supply a program of government. Burning a town hall cannot improve a school. Looting a shop cannot restore purchasing power. The destruction of public property consumes resources that protesters themselves insist are desperately scarce. A democracy must protect peaceful dissent and respond to the grievances behind it. It must also distinguish that dissent from violence. To romanticize destruction as revolutionary energy is to evade responsibility for what follows. France’s predicament is especially acute because the state is being asked to provide more while struggling to finance the commitments it already carries. Its social model embodies achievements that citizens understandably value: security in old age, public services and protection against the harsher consequences of the market. But those achievements require a durable economic foundation. A promise does not become sustainable simply because withdrawing or revising it would be politically painful. The International Monetary Fund has warned that France’s high debt, modest growth and rising spending pressures require a credible multiyear adjustment. The difficulty is no longer merely identifying the problem. It is assembling the political consent to act on it. Pension reform captures the impasse. Emmanuel Macron’s government enacted an increase in the retirement age from 62 to 64 in 2023, only for the reform to be suspended as part of the political bargaining over the 2026 budget. A measure presented as essential to the system’s future proved unable to secure lasting acceptance. The obligations remain. The adjustment is deferred, standing as a particularly poor bargain for younger generations. Preserving every existing entitlement may look like solidarity, but it becomes harder to defend when the bill is passed to people whose own prospects are increasingly uncertain. Intergenerational fairness requires attention to those who will finance the system as well as those who currently benefit from it. Britain’s experience under Margaret Thatcher offers an uncomfortable comparison. Her determination to confront entrenched interests made her a symbol of reform, although the social costs of her policies remain deeply contested. France needs something of that willingness to face choices that postponement has made more difficult. Resolve alone, however, is insufficient. Reform must explain who will bear the burden, why the distribution is fair and what citizens can reasonably expect in return. Otherwise, fiscal necessity becomes another phrase through which people hear that their lives must grow harder. The political danger is that repeated failure discredits the very idea of democratic compromise. When mainstream parties cannot reconcile promises with resources, movements offering more sweeping answers gain an opening. The extremes need not demonstrate that their programs will work. They need only persuade voters that the existing parties have exhausted their claim to govern. Immigration adds another source of division. Instability in the Middle East and Africa has placed difficult questions of refuge, borders and integration before European societies. Those questions demand workable policies and cooperation. When they instead become tests of national loyalty, the space for compromise contracts further. France’s unrest should not be reduced to immigration, nor should migration become a convenient explanation for failures of fiscal management and public provision. But a political system already weakened by domestic frustration is more vulnerable to movements that turn anxiety into hostility. The revolutionary inheritance offers a warning here as well as inspiration. The fall of the old order did not assure France a peaceful or liberal future. Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette went to the guillotine; so did Robespierre, whose name became inseparable from revolutionary terror. Those who unleash upheaval cannot assume they will control its course. Revolution can destroy an exhausted order. It cannot guarantee that what follows will be more just, more capable or more humane. France now needs the patience to negotiate change and the courage to carry it through. That means acknowledging legitimate hardship while confronting fiscal limits, protecting dissent while enforcing the law, and making solidarity an obligation shared across generations. Gradual reform is often harder than dramatic rupture. It requires citizens to accept imperfect bargains and leaders to defend decisions whose benefits may arrive after their own political careers have ended. But each reform abandoned makes the next confrontation more likely. A country that has repeatedly changed the world through revolution must now show that it can change itself through democratic consent. * The author is a professor emeritus of law at Seoul National University, where he served as its 26th president from 2014 to 2018. He holds a doctorate in law from Paris II University and previously headed the Korean Public Law Association, the Korean Law Professors Association and the National Assembly’s Public Officials Ethics Committee. **The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of AJP. October 23, 2026 11 -
Republicans to Spend $1.3 Billion in Midterm Elections Amid Grim Polls The Republican Party is set to significantly outspend the Democrats in the upcoming midterm elections on November 3. According to an analysis by the Financial Times on October 21, Republican committees and outside groups are expected to spend over $1.3 billion (approximately 1.72 trillion won) during this election cycle. In contrast, the Democrats plan to allocate around $800 million (about 1.05 trillion won).The Republicans also hold a substantial advantage in cash reserves available for the elections. The cash reserves of Republican political action committees (PACs) total $683 million, while their Democratic counterparts have only $484 million.When factoring in the funds from President Donald Trumps Super PAC, MAGA Inc., and another Super PAC established by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, known as America PAC, the Republican cash reserves could rise to $900 million, according to the Financial Times analysis.Despite the massive campaign funding, recent polls indicate a challenging outlook for the Republicans. A survey by RealClearPolitics shows that 60% of respondents do not support President Trumps handling of his duties.Additionally, a CNN poll released on the same day revealed that when asked which partys candidate they would support in their district, 49% of respondents favored the Democrats, significantly outpacing the Republicans at 39%.The Financial Times noted, Given the polling results, the Democrats are likely to gain control of both the House and the Senate, adding that Republican candidates are ramping up their TV and online advertising efforts to shift the momentum in their favor.* This article has been translated by AI. October 22, 2026 17
-
High-Level Symposium Celebrates 140 Years of Korea-France Diplomatic Relations On October 16, a high-level symposium marking the 140th anniversary of diplomatic relations between Korea and France was successfully held at the French National Assembly, according to the French-Korean Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FKCCI) on October 22.The event, co-hosted by FKCCI, the European think tank KEY, ANAFF-ONU Korea, the France-Korea Forum, and the Monclair Center, featured discussions on the historical roots of the bilateral relationship, the legacy of the Korean War, and geopolitical changes on the Korean Peninsula. Participants engaged in in-depth discussions aimed at expanding political, institutional, and economic cooperation.The symposium also highlighted the expansion of cooperation beyond traditional diplomatic and commercial exchanges into advanced manufacturing and consumer goods. Notably, significant investment agreements were announced, including Air Liquides acquisition of DIG Airgas, valued at approximately 4.6 trillion won, and Opimo Mobilitys purchase of Hyundai Mobis lamp division, worth around 600 billion won.Representatives from major companies and institutions, including Korean Air, Air Liquide, Opimo Mobility, Cosmetic Valley, the Korea International Trade Association (KITA), and MEDEF International, the international cooperation organization under Frances largest business association, MEDEF, attended the event.Notable attendees included Louis Gallois, former chairman of Airbus and SNCF; Philippe Gautier, CEO of MEDEF International; Shim Hyun-jin, head of Korean Airs Paris branch and president of the Paris Korea-France Chamber of Commerce; Philippe Lee, honorary chairman of FKCCI; and David Pierre Jalicon, president of FKCCI, who all contributed to the events significance.Additionally, key political figures, including Kwon Hyun-wook, South Koreas ambassador to France, French lawmakers, and diplomats, were present. Song Young-gil, a member of the National Assembly and special advisor on peace diplomacy to President Lee Jae-myung, and Jean-Noël Barrot, Frances Minister for European Affairs, sent video congratulatory messages that elevated the events profile.This symposium served as a platform for opinion leaders from politics, business, diplomacy, and academia to gather at the French National Assembly, reaffirming the historical trust shared by both nations and confirming their evolution into a stronger next-generation partnership through concrete investments and innovations.During the event, which also celebrated the 40th anniversary of FKCCI, David Pierre Jalicon presented a joint commemorative book titled 140/40 Book to honor the 140th anniversary of Korea-France diplomatic relations and the 40th anniversary of economic cooperation.Furthermore, on October 15, FKCCI signed a new memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Cosmetic Valley, Frances largest cosmetics cluster, to strengthen cooperation in the cosmetics industry between the two countries. Philippe Lee, honorary chairman of FKCCI, and Marc-Antoine Jamet, secretary general of LVMH and president of Cosmetic Valley, indicated that this collaboration would create strong synergies in the beauty sector of both nations.This year marks the 140th anniversary of diplomatic relations between Korea and France, highlighted by reciprocal state visits between President Lee Jae-myung and President Emmanuel Macron, resulting in the elevation of their diplomatic ties to a global strategic partnership for the first time in 22 years.Looking ahead, both countries have agreed to strengthen cooperation in advanced industries such as artificial intelligence (AI) and semiconductors, with FKCCI actively promoting economic exchanges between the two nations. October 22, 2026 15
-
Democratic Party Calls for Additional Arrest Warrant for Kim Geon-hee As the expiration of Kim Geon-hees detention period approaches on October 31, the Democratic Party is urging the Supreme Court to issue an additional arrest warrant for her. On October 21, Park Sung-jun, the partys chief spokesperson, stated in a written briefing, There are growing public concerns and doubts that Kim Geon-hee may be released due to the expiration of her detention period. We strongly urge the Supreme Court to make a swift and strict judgment in accordance with the law and principles, and to make a responsible decision that aligns with public common sense and expectations. Currently, Kim is undergoing detention trials related to three major allegations: involvement in stock manipulation at Deutsche Motors, receiving free public opinion polling from Myung Tae-kyun, and accepting luxury bags from the Unification Church while interfering in internal party elections. The second trials verdict was issued on April 28, but the Supreme Court postponed the ruling after referring the case to a full bench on July 24 to examine the allegations regarding the Myung Tae-kyun polling. The full bench decided to continue the hearing on October 22, following a session on September 29, making it virtually impossible to issue a ruling before the detention expiration date of October 31. In response, the special prosecutors team submitted a request on October 15 to the Supreme Court panel handling the appeal of the bribery in public office case to issue an additional arrest warrant to prevent Kims release. Park emphasized, The allegations against Kim Geon-hee are clear. Even if the detention period for the ongoing case expires, if the legal requirements are met for a separate case, an additional arrest warrant can be issued. Members of the ruling party and key figures within the party have also launched a full-scale offensive against the Supreme Court and Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae. Former Democratic Party leader Jeong Cheong-rae stated on his Facebook page, Politics is about timing. If Kim Geon-hee is released, there will be strong criticism asking, What did the Democratic Party do without impeaching Cho Hee-dae? There are sufficient reasons and justification for the impeachment of Cho Hee-dae, and public sentiment is high. Now is the best time to decisively move forward with the impeachment decision against Cho Hee-dae. Park Beom-gye, a Democratic Party lawmaker and former judge, also remarked, Issuing an additional arrest warrant related to the bribery in public office case as requested by the special prosecutor is a natural and customary practice that all courts should follow. We need to observe whether the referral to the full bench was intended to facilitate Kim Geon-hees release. * This article has been translated by AI. October 21, 2026 17
-
Democratic Party Launches Training Institute; Kim Min-seok Emphasizes Education for Member Sovereignty Kim Min-seok, leader of the Democratic Party, emphasized the importance of education for party members as a key task for realizing member sovereignty.During the launch ceremony of the partys training institute held at the National Assembly on October 21, Kim stated, One member, one vote is just the beginning and merely a formality. Education for party members seems to be essential for realizing member sovereignty.He referenced the partys upcoming centennial anniversary and highlighted the qualities that future leadership must possess, including dedication to the public and continuous learning. He cited former Presidents Kim Dae-jung, Roh Moo-hyun, Moon Jae-in, and current President Lee Jae-myung as examples, pointing out two common traits among them.Kim remarked, Politics that involves studying is the best politics, and a party that engages in learning is the best party, reiterating the significance of member education. He also mentioned Roh Moo-hyuns concept of the organized power of awakened citizens, stating, Organizing educated party members is key. He proposed that the training institute serve as the central institution supporting this educational effort.He stressed the need to improve educational methods so that party members can better grasp the partys history, values, policies, and key issues. This initiative aims to establish a system that conveys the partys values to both existing and new members in their daily lives.Meanwhile, Kim Hyun, the head of the training institute, pledged to enhance the institutes operations to ensure that the Presidents governance philosophy is effectively communicated to party members.* This article has been translated by AI. October 21, 2026 15
-
France's Anger Is Not Just Their Problem: South Korea Must Address Fiscal and Educational Issues France is in turmoil. Hundreds of thousands of citizens have taken to the streets, protesting against rising living costs and fuel prices. On October 17, government estimates indicated that 550,000 people participated in nationwide demonstrations, while labor unions claimed the number reached 800,000. Major cities like Paris, Marseille, and Lyon witnessed incidents of arson and looting, reflecting long-standing economic instability and political distrust within French society.Notably, the protests were sparked by grievances originating in schools. Complaints about teacher shortages, outdated facilities, and poor educational environments have merged with broader discontent over living costs among workers and the lower class. This distrust in education has intertwined with concerns over livelihoods, escalating into a broader critique of national governance.The economic situation in France is challenging. In September, energy prices surged by 21.3% compared to the same month last year. The government has proposed a fiscal improvement plan for 2027 amounting to €43 billion. National debt is projected to reach 119.3% of this years GDP. Political compromise between a government needing to reduce deficits and citizens demanding stability has proven elusive.While the protests in France cannot be wholly justified, peaceful assembly and freedom of expression must be upheld in a democratic society. However, acts of arson, looting, and destruction of public property are unacceptable. It is crucial to distinguish between legal accountability for violent actions and citizens legitimate policy demands. Merely penalizing illegal activities will not resolve the structural issues in education and livelihoods.South Korea should not view this situation as merely a European political crisis. The economic structures, welfare systems, and fiscal conditions of France and South Korea differ significantly. However, the fundamental principles of governance remain the same. Sustainable national finances are essential for maintaining welfare, a solid education system is vital for securing the future, and political trust is necessary for successful reforms.First, national debt must be managed rigorously. Debt is not inherently bad, nor should it be increased indiscriminately. Fiscal investments are necessary to respond to recessions and disasters while securing future growth. The key issue lies in how debt is utilized and who bears the burden.The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) projects that South Koreas public debt will exceed 50% of GDP by 2027. Although this is lower than Frances level, it is not a cause for complacency. South Korea faces rapid aging, low birth rates, and declining potential growth rates. Long-term financial expenditures for pensions, healthcare, and caregiving will inevitably rise. Current fiscal decisions will shape the tax burdens and policy choices for future generations.The government must manage not only the total amount of national debt but also its growth rate, interest burden, and the productivity of expenditures. It is essential to transparently disclose the long-term financial burdens of national debt, public institution debt, and pensions, incorporating them into medium- to long-term fiscal plans. Fiscal rules should allow for flexibility in responding to economic conditions while effectively controlling debt growth during normal times.Second, education financing should be viewed not merely as an expenditure item but as an investment that determines the nations future. As the protests in France illustrate, when the fundamental functions of education are compromised, youth trust in the state diminishes. South Korea is no exception.The education system faces complex challenges, including declining school-age populations, regional extinction, burdens of private education, and restructuring of universities. Education budgets should not be mechanically reduced simply because student numbers are falling. Conversely, maintaining past budget allocation methods is also not a solution.The focus of education financing should shift from simple distribution based on student numbers to quality and equity in education. It is necessary to improve the imbalance in teacher placement, renovate aging school facilities, and reduce educational disparities between regions. In particular, it is crucial to enhance digital literacy and balanced education in science, mathematics, and humanities, especially in the age of artificial intelligence (AI). Understanding human dignity, freedom, and critical thinking is as important as the ability to utilize AI.Third, fiscal reforms that protect livelihoods are necessary. Under the pretext of ensuring fiscal soundness, burdens should not be disproportionately placed on vulnerable groups, nor should essential education, healthcare, and caregiving services be weakened. However, expanding financial support to all classes is also not sustainable.The government should review ineffective subsidies, overlapping projects, and insufficient tax reductions. At the same time, policies aimed at reducing energy costs, housing expenses, and education fees for the lower class must be carefully analyzed for their target audience and effectiveness. Using limited resources where they are most needed is a fundamental principle of finance.Fourth, national reforms require political consensus. The deepening fiscal crisis in France is attributed not only to economic factors but also to a divided parliament and a fragile political compromise structure. South Korea must also address pension, healthcare, education, labor, and fiscal issues beyond partisan interests.The National Assembly must fulfill its constitutional responsibility to review and oversee the governments budget. The government should not only present the need for reforms in numerical terms but also transparently communicate the burdens and benefits to the public. Both ruling and opposition parties must cooperate on issues that reduce the burdens on future generations and maintain essential public services.Finally, national fiscal policies should be designed to balance growth and distribution, as well as present and future needs. Investments in semiconductors, AI, biotechnology, energy, and advanced manufacturing are crucial for enhancing South Koreas growth potential. However, not all projects labeled as future industries are good investments. Economic viability, technical feasibility, and the potential for private investment must be rigorously verified. Continuously funneling taxpayer money into unproductive projects does not constitute an investment in the future but rather exacerbates future burdens.The anger resonating in the streets of France cannot be interpreted solely as a demand for lower taxes and increased welfare. It also questions how faithfully the state is providing the basic living conditions promised to its citizens and how equitably the burdens of reform are being shared.The lessons for South Korea are clear: welfare cannot be sustained without sound finances, growth cannot endure without quality education, and reforms are unlikely to succeed without public trust.National debt must be managed responsibly, education must be innovated as an investment for the future, and livelihoods must be closely protected. The political sphere must foster the necessary social consensus throughout this process.The greatness of a nation lies not in how much money it spends but in how responsibly it uses taxpayer money. It also depends on whether it can protect todays citizens while providing better opportunities for future generations.South Korea must view Frances anger as an opportunity to reflect on its own future. Crises do not begin suddenly in the streets; they deepen when long-standing issues are neglected and the voices of the people are ignored. The responsibility of politics is not merely to manage the aftermath of an explosion of anger but to proactively address the structural problems that give rise to such anger.* This article has been translated by AI. October 21, 2026 13
-
Alberta's Independence Vote Fails as 77% Choose to Remain in Canada A referendum on whether Alberta, a province known for its oil wealth, should pursue independence has been rejected by voters.On October 20, the Alberta Election Commission reported that with over one million ballots counted, approximately 77% of voters opted to remain part of Canada. This information was relayed by Yonhap News, citing reports from the Associated Press.Only 23% of residents supported initiating the secession process.Alberta Premier Danielle Smith welcomed the voting outcome on social media, stating, Alberta residents have chosen a stronger Alberta within a united Canada. Despite her opposition to secession, Smith was reportedly pressured by separatists within her party, the United Conservative Party, to hold the referendum.Alberta, a major oil-producing region and a stronghold for conservative politics, held the referendum on October 19 to determine whether to initiate a binding vote on remaining part of Canada or pursuing independence. This vote was not to finalize independence but to gauge support for starting the formal process.Concerns among Alberta residents have been raised regarding the federal governments carbon tax and green energy transition policies, which they believe threaten the energy sector, a key part of the local economy. Critics argue that the federal government has overstepped its bounds by interfering in provincial matters such as resource development, immigration, and welfare policies, fueling the secessionist sentiment.Earlier, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney expressed deep concern during a rally in Calgary on October 15, stating that the referendum comes at a worst time when outside forces are attempting to divide the country.While Carney did not directly mention the United States, there have been ongoing suspicions within Canada that associates of U.S. President Donald Trump are influencing Albertas secession efforts. Carney warned that if the secession movement were to materialize, it could ultimately benefit only the United States strategically.There have been several instances in the past where federal environmental policies have sparked significant backlash from local communities. In 2022, U.S. states reliant on traditional energy industries, such as coal and oil, clashed with the federal government over stricter fossil fuel regulations, leading to collective lawsuits against the Environmental Protection Agency. Similarly, in 2019, farmers in the Netherlands protested against the central governments nitrogen emission reduction policies, fearing for their livelihoods, resulting in large-scale tractor demonstrations.* This article has been translated by AI. October 20, 2026 16
-
Challenges Emerge in U.S.-South Korea Alliance Despite Summit Agreements Lee Jae-myung, the President of South Korea, and U.S. President Donald Trump reached broad agreements on economic and security issues during their summit. However, subsequent discussions have revealed significant differences between the two countries. Concerns have also arisen regarding the potential leak of North Korean nuclear information and allegations of restrictions on U.S.-South Korea intelligence sharing, putting the South Korean Foreign Ministrys ability to manage the alliance and coordinate North Korea diplomacy to the test.On the 19th, some diplomatic analysts emphasized the need for coordination between South Korea and the U.S. on various issues. One point of contention is the allocation of the $350 billion (approximately 468 trillion won) investment in the U.S., where South Korea and the U.S. have differing views. Additionally, comments made by Jeong Dong-young, the Minister of Unification, regarding North Korean nuclear facilities have raised suspicions that the U.S. is limiting information sharing. Reports indicate that South Koreas Ambassador to the U.S., Kang Kyung-wha, has expressed difficulties in communicating with the White House.With less than a month until the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Shenzhen, China, pre-summit coordination between South Korea and the U.S. regarding a potential North Korea-U.S. summit has become a pressing issue. If differences with the U.S. are not resolved, there are concerns that President Lee, who has positioned himself as a facilitator, may be sidelined even if a North Korea-U.S. summit takes place.Furthermore, controversy has arisen over remarks made by U.S. Forces Korea Commander General Jay B. H. Brunson, who stated, South Korea starts at the southern fence line of the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ). There is a significant gap between the South Korean Ministry of National Defense, which is pushing for the return of wartime operational control, and General Brunsons stance.Lee Shin-hwa, a professor of political science and diplomacy at Korea University, emphasized in a conversation with Aju Economy that diplomacy between nations is based on predictability and trust, adding that diplomacy is not just about promises between leaders; details are extremely important.Jeon Bong-geun, an honorary professor at the National Diplomatic Academy, acknowledged that short-term disagreements and conflicts between South Korea and the U.S. are inevitable, but noted that if there is domestic consensus, South Koreas negotiating power with the U.S. would be strengthened; currently, the opposite is true.He further suggested that the Foreign Ministry has a responsibility to manage the foundation of the South Korea-U.S. relationship as the primary agency for external relations. He warned that without significantly enhancing the Foreign Ministrys organizational and strategic capabilities in the face of great power politics and a self-reliant era, external relations will become increasingly challenging. October 19, 2026 17
-
New Book Explores Geopolitics and the Silicon Shield Geopolitics and the Silicon Shield by Jeong Jae-yong, Barun Books.In an era marked by U.S.-China power rivalry and a transformative shift in artificial intelligence (AI), what is South Koreas survival strategy? The new book Geopolitics and the Silicon Shield finds answers in the K semiconductor sector, represented by Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix. The author emphasizes that semiconductors serve as a silicon shield supporting South Koreas economy and security.The book examines geopolitical conflicts that disrupt international order, including U.S.-China strategic competition, great power politics stemming from the Trump administration, the U.S.-Iran conflict, and the Russia-Ukraine war. It also addresses North Koreas nuclear and missile threats and the foreign policy of the Lee Jae-myung administration.As competition among major powers expands into a struggle for dominance in advanced technologies, the competitiveness of the semiconductor industry is increasingly tied to national security. The book analyzes how the strategic value of semiconductors is growing, especially in the AI era. The author warns, The moment the technological edge of K semiconductors collapses, serious cracks will appear in our K silicon shield, which will mean the collapse of South Koreas security defenses. Protecting and nurturing the semiconductor industry is framed as a national security imperative.Author Jeong Jae-yong has worked as a journalist at Yonhap News for 32 years, serving as political department head, head of the unification and diplomacy department, Hong Kong correspondent, and editorial writer. He holds a Ph.D. in North Korean studies and currently serves as a visiting professor at the Institute of East Asian Studies at Kyungnam University and as an international advisory committee member at Samsung Global Research.* This article has been translated by AI. October 19, 2026 15